By:
Seema
Goswami,
IndiaFM
Tuesday,
August
29,
2006
Everybody
has
their
own
take
on
it,
but
I
have
to
say
that
I
loved
Kabhi
Alvida
Naa
Kehna.
The
first
half
had
me
giggling
helplessly,
the
second
found
me
all
teary
and
sentimental
(Karan
Johar
will
do
this
to
me
every
time)
while
the
ending
brought
a
lump
to
my
throat.
And
even
days
after,
I
found
myself
thinking
of
the
movie.
Why
was
it
necessary
to
keep
Dev
and
Maya
apart
for
three
years?
Why
did
Dev
have
to
be
so
bloody-minded
with
that
adorable
kid
of
his?
Was
Sam
modeled
on
that
other
elderly
rake,
Hugh
Hefner?
How
could
any
woman
-
let
alone
his
wife
-
fall
to
be
charmed
by
Rishi?
But
even
after
I
lost
interest
in
the
answers
so
these
questions,
the
one
thing
that
I
kept
coming
back
to
was
poor
Preity
Zinta.
I
couldn't
help
feeling
just
a
wee
bit
sorry
for
her.
No,
not
because
she
was
tarred
with
the
'career
bitch'
tag.
I
don't
think
there's
anything
particularly
wrong
with
being
one,
especially
if
your
pay
cheque
is
supporting
your
family
in
style.
No,
it
was
Preity's
style,
or
rather
the
way
she
was
made
to
dress
in
the
movie,
that
made
me
pity
her
most
sincerely.
As
the
editor
of
New
York's
leading
fashion
magazine,
she
should
have
been
the
epitome
of
urban
sophistication,
easy
elegance
and
cutting-edge
style.
And
with
the
kind
of
budgets
that
Karan
Johar's
films
enjoy,
buying
the
outfits
that
make
for
such
a
look
couldn't
possibly
have
been
a
problem.
Hell,
given
the
kind
of
publicity
Hindi
movies
generate,
all
the
international
labels
currently
selling
in
India
would
have
fallen
over
each
other
to
provide
free
outfits.
Channel,
for
instance,
would
have
been
only
too
happy
to
dress
Preity,
given
how
often
she
wears
that
label
in
real
life.
And
there
is
no
disputing
that
nothing
becomes
a
fashion
editor
more
than
a
sharply
tailored
tweed
twin
set
(multiple
strings
of
pearls
optional).
For
a
trendier,
less
formal
look,
the
jacket
could
have
been
paired
with
a
pair
of
skinny
jeans
and
a
funky
belt.
And
a
floaty,
chiffon
dress
would
have
been
just
the
ticket
for
a
more
feminine
feel.
Instead,
poor
Preity
was
made
to
wear
the
most
hideously
inappropriate
clothes
throughout
the
movie.
Her
entrance
in
the
film,
when
she
appears
for
a
job
interview
at
the
magazine
she
later
goes
on
the
edit,
says
it
all.
In
a
skin-tight
dress,
she
looks
more
like
a
tightly
encased
sausage
auditioning
for
the
part
of
high-priced
call
girl,
than
a
journalist
who
aspires
to
be
a
fashion
editor.
In
one
memorable
scene
in
which
she
is
walking
down
a
New
York
street
on
her
way
to
work,
blissfully
unaware
that
Rani
is
right
behind
her,
she
is
wearing
a
denim
mini-skirt
with
a
sequined
hemline.
I
mean,
seriously,
which
fashion
editor
would
be
caught
deed
in
that,
let
alone
wear
it
to
office?
That's
the
kind
of
outfight
you
say
goodbye
to
after
college.
What
was
Manish
Malhotra
thinking?
Surely,
as
a
fashion
designer,
he
is
reasonably
au
fait
with
what
high-powered
fashion
editors
wear?
And
if
he
had
any
doubts,
he
didn't
need
to
look
any
further
than
Anna
Wintour,
style
icon
and
editor
of
American
Vogue.
But
even
if
he
wasn't
thinking
too
clearly,
sheer
common
sense
should
have
told
him
that
no
career
woman
would
dream
of
going
to
office
dressed
as
a
boho
chick.
Women-yes,
even
those
inhabiting
the
world
of
high
fashion-want
to
project
of
professional
image
at
work,
not
have
people
peering
down
their
cleavage
or
leering
at
their
thighs.
What
a
pity
that
The
Devil
Wears
Prada
was
released
too
late
for
Manish
to
seek
inspiration
from
it.
That
was
a
movie
that
had
the
New
York
fashion
scene
nailed
right
down
to
the
Manolo
Blahnik
stiletto.
But
that
film
released
just
before
KANK,
so
Manish
was
left
to
trawl
the
stores
all
on
his
own
and
ended
up
creating
a
look
that
was
more
LA
than
New
York.
And
not
even
elegant
LA
at
that.
What
made
this
style
travesty
even
more
tragic
was
that
Preity
herself
is
an
incredibly
stylish
dresser
in
real
life,
one
of
the
few
actresses
who
knows
her
Versace
from
her
Valentino.
She
knows
what
becomes
her
best
where
casual
wear
is
concerned
and
her
instinct
for
a
correct.
So,
it
was
particularly
jarring
to
see
her
in
clothes
that
suited
neither
her
character
nor
her
body
type.
Perhaps,
it
would
have
been
better
for
all
concerned
if
her
natural
elegance
had
been
allowed
free
reign.
As
it
turned
out,
she
looked
less
like
a
fashion
editor
in
the
movie
than
she
does
in
real
life.
And
that's
a
real
shame.