pavan malhotra
Courtesy: IndiaFM
Monday, August 28, 2006
Pavan Malhotra - the name might not strike an instant chord with the present generation audience. But anyone who was glued to the small screen in the 80s and remember serials like Nukkad and Circus might identify the talented actor. Talented because his first two films where he played the title role (Salim Langde Pe Mat Ro and Bagh Bahadur) won the National Award, and both in the same year (1989) as the best Hindi and best Indian film. His National award connection doesn't end there. He won the Best Actor award for the film Fakeer in 1998. However, despite all the critical acclaim, commercial success always eluded Pavan.
Hopefully things should change with next film Don. Yes, Shahrukh Khan's Don where he plays the negative lead.
You are being seen in Don after a very long time. How does that feel? It feels good. Any actor likes their work to be seen on the big screen. It's a big high.
Two
of
your
films
Black
Friday
and
Perfect
Husband
could
not
hit
the
screens.
Are
you
disappointed?
I
feel
very
sad.
As
far
as
Black
Friday
is
concerned,
the
verdict
is
around
the
corner.
The
producers
are
quite
involved
and
a
lot
of
people
have
put
in
their
hard-work.
I
think
it
is
one
of
the
best
films
around
and
so
everybody
should
get
to
see
it.
Tell us about your role in Don?
I am playing one of the villains in Don and I found it really interesting. It's going to release this Diwali so go see it.
Would
you
call
this
film
a
comeback
of
sorts?
You
can
say
that.
This
will
be
the
release
of
a
feature
film
having
me
in
it
after
a
long
time.
I
am
doing
very
few
commercial
films
and
if
it
starts
with
Don
you
can
call
it
something
of
a
comeback.
Was
there
any
added
pressure
working
on
a
remake?
No,
I
don't
think
there
was
any
added
pressure.
I
am
not
the
kind
of
actor
who
takes
notes
and
thinks
about
what
the
original
role
was,
etc.
Farhan
Akthar
gave
us
a
bound
script
and
it
is
not
a
shot
by
shot
copy
of
the
original.
He
has
given
his
own
touches
to
the
film.
The
script
and
the
way
he
has
shot
the
film
are
different.
The
characters
are
also
finer.
Even
otherwise
as
an
actor
it
is
your
job
to
read
a
script
and
conceive
the
character,
the
actor
wants
it
to.
One
should
never
go
by
what
has
been
done.
You
are
apparently
enacting
Kamal
Kapoor's
role
from
the
original.
Didn't
you
even
go
through
the
original
film
or
check
out
Kamal's
character?
No,
as
I
said
I
am
not
that
kind
of
actor.
If
a
film
is
being
adapted
from
a
novel
and
if
the
director
insists
I
read
the
novel
then
I
will
go
and
read
it.
Otherwise
I
will
go
by
the
script
because
that
is
what
my
character
should
be
like
and
that
is
what
is
the
point
of
view
my
director
has.
So
I
won't
go
and
watch
Mr.
Kamal
Kapoor
and
see
what
he
had
done.
I
am
a
thinking
actor.
If
5
people
are
playing
the
same
role
then
the
5
will
all
portray
it
in
5
different
ways.
All
5
can
be
right
as
well
so
it's
not
as
if
I
am
right
and
Kamal
is
wrong.
You
are
also
doing
My
Name
is
Anthony
Gonsalves
as
well.
Tell
us
about
that.
My
Name
is
Anthony
Gonsalves
is
being
directed
by
E.
Niwas.
I
can't
talk
much
about
it
but
I
am
playing
a
guy
connected
to
the
underworld.
This
is
another
Pavan
Malhotra
series
of
underworld
films
and
in
one
way
it's
a
challenge
for
me
to
do
an
underworld
character
in
a
different
manner
trying
to
give
different
shades
which
makes
it
different
for
me.
I
can't
just
lie
back
and
do
it.
Off
course
the
script
also
helps
as
well.
The
seed
is
always
in
the
script.
How
you
trim
the
tree
and
give
it
the
perfect
look
is
up
to
the
actor.
I
have
played
roles
related
to
the
underworld
about
4
times
now
and
have
always
tried
to
give
a
different
touch.
Even
a
don
has
different
shades
like
the
background
he
has
come
from
and
what
stage
he
is
in
his
profession.
In
my
film
Salim
Langde
Pe
Mat
Ro,
he
is
trying
to
climb
the
stairs.
So
the
body
language
and
the
attitude
are
different.
So
do
you
prefer
playing
underworld
roles?
No,
I
like
to
act
with
whatever
is
offered
to
me.
Once
a
script
is
offered,
I
read
the
script
and
if
the
role
is
important
then
I
like
to
perform
it.
I
am
an
actor
and
like
to
play
all
different
sorts
of
roles.
It
is
just
a
co-incidence
that
I
have
acted
as
a
don
so
many
times.
If
a
role
is
offered
to
me,
I
won't
say
that
I
have
already
done
that
but
will
see
if
the
role
is
different
or
challenging.
If
you
are
an
actor
then
you
should
do
all
sorts
of
things
and
not
just
stick
in
a
particular
slot.
Apart
from
Don
and
My
Name
is
Anthony
Gonsalves,
what
else
are
you
doing?
I
am
waiting
for
a
film
called
Pachas
Lakh
which
Percept
Picture
Company
and
Sahara
are
going
to
release.
They
will
be
out
with
a
print
this
month
and
are
looking
for
a
right
time
and
date
to
release
the
film
because
it
is
not
a
big
starrer.
It
is
a
very
interesting
film
and
I
really
like
it
and
would
want
everybody
to
watch
it.
You
are
credited
indirectly
for
getting
SRK
a
break
into
films.
How
does
that
feel?
That's
not
true!
Nobody
gives
anyone
a
break.
If
I
could
give
a
break,
I
could
have
given
it
to
myself.
If
someone
is
saying
that,
it
is
generous
of
them.
Everyone
comes
with
their
own
luck
and
destiny.
Destiny
brings
people
to
the
right
place
at
the
right
time.
If
I
was
the
source
of
something,
it
is
his
destiny.
Coming
to
your
pre-Don
days,
tell
us
how
your
career
as
an
actor
began.
I
started
doing
theatre
in
Delhi
in
the
late
seventies.
I
was
in
college
at
that
time.
It
started
off
as
a
hobby.
I
never
thought
that
I
will
become
a
professional
actor
who
will
be
paid
for
his
acting.
I
came
to
Mumbai
because
this
is
where
the
films
were
being
made.
Those
days,
I
used
to
get
Rs.100-150
for
my
performances
on
Doordarshan.
I
had
a
short
stint
of
plays
and
skits
on
it
but
my
acting
started
full
swing
with
a
serial
called
Nukkad.
Tell
us
about
your
Nukkad
experience.
To
begin
with,
it
was
a
break
of
sorts
for
me.
I
got
an
interesting
role
and
got
to
work
with
interesting
people.
Aziz
Mirza
and
Kundan
Shah
were
there.
They
worked
as
a
team.
It
was
a
very
good
team
to
work
with.
There
were
two
types
of
actors.
One
set
was
whose
careers
were
being
revived
with
the
serial
and
the
others
were
like
me
who
were
just
starting
off.
The
entire
unit
was
so
relaxed.
Most
of
the
times
there
were
twenty
six
actors
in
one
frame.
So
it
was
a
great
workshop
in
taking
your
cue
and
then
giving
space
to
another
actor.
After
theatre,
I
was
suddenly
facing
the
camera.
So
it
was
a
great
training
ground
for
me.
It
was
a
very
popular
serial
and
people
still
remember
it.
Then
there
was
also
Mahesh
Bhatt's
Zameen
Aasman
on
TV.
Tell
us
a
little
about
that.
People
keep
telling
me
that
I
was
a
part
of
very
good
serials.
I
feel
lucky
that
such
kind
of
work
was
offered
to
me.
I
worked
with
Hrishikesh
Mukherjee
in
another
serial
Ujaale
Ki
Ore
and
of
course
Mahesh
Bhatt's
Zameen
Aasman.
I
consider
myself
lucky
because
I
worked
in
good
serials
and
had
good
roles
and
good
directors.
Zameen
Aasman
was
also
an
interesting
experience.
The
character
was
complicated.
I
felt
that
the
audience
was
not
able
to
decide
whether
he
is
a
good
or
a
bad
guy.
That's
what
happened.
Whenever
he
lied,
he
never
made
faces.
In
real
life,
whenever
we
lie,
we
never
make
faces.
People
just
lie
with
a
straight
face.
As
an
actor,
I
feel
very
good
that
people
still
remember
my
work.
Do
you
think
the
television
scenario
has
changed
from
then
to
now
with
more
melodrama
seeping
in
and
the
actual
story
being
sidelined?
Change
is
always
happening.
Even
cinema
has
changed.
All
sorts
of
cinema
and
TV
should
happen
for
everyone.
The
bigger
chunk
of
what's
happening
can
disturb
us.
It
also
differs
from
person
to
person.
Maybe
what
I
don't
like
may
appeal
to
someone
else.
A
film
like
Omkara
really
excited
me.
I
saw
it
twice
and
the
second
time
I
saw
it,
I
liked
it
even
more.
I'm
planning
to
watch
it
again.
Maybe,
someone
else
won't
like
it.
There
should
be
all
sorts
of
genres
for
everyone.
I
have
done
serials
which
have
had
a
very
realistic
approach.
Salim
Langde
Pe
Mat
Ro
has
turned
to
be
a
cult
film
in
parallel
or
offbeat
cinema.
You
played
the
title
role.
How
did
the
film
happen?
Share
some
experiences
about
that.
I
have
worked
with
Saeed
Mirza
in
Nukkad.
I
did
Manoranjan
and
Circus
with
the
same
company.
I
was
not
the
first
choice
for
Salim
Langde....
When
the
script
was
being
written,
the
writers
realized
that
they
needed
a
younger
guy,
who
can
bring
vulnerability
to
the
character.
I
think
Naseeruddin
Shah
was
the
original
choice.
When
I
was
told
that
I
had
been
selected
for
the
role,
I
was
so
excited
that
I
could
not
even
react.
Is
it
true
that
you
and
Makarand
Deshpande
went
to
Chor
Bazaar
to
get
a
feel
of
the
character?
I
knew
that
area
as
I
had
done
production
in
that
area
for
Saeed.
I
told
Makarand
that
I'd
take
him
around
there.
We
would
just
hang
out
in
the
area,
have
tea
and
talk
to
people.
We
tried
to
get
a
feel
of
how
people
look
and
their
body
language.
Buddhadev
Dasgupta
has
just
won
a
National
award
with
Kaalpurush.
His
first
national
award
film
Bagh
Bahadur
starred
you
in
the
lead
role.
That
was
by
far
one
of
your
best
performances...
I
don't
know
if
it
was
my
best
performance
or
not.
I
got
that
film
immediately
after
Salim
Langde
Pe
Mat
Ro.
As
an
actor,
it
was
very
exciting
for
me
because
both
the
films
were
poles
apart.
One
was
a
guy
who
was
flamboyant
and
was
trying
to
impress
people.
He
was
trying
to
be
a
part
of
the
underworld
biggies.
Then
suddenly,
you
play
a
folk
dancer
who
is
so
soft,
without
any
aggression.
He's
a
star
in
himself.
Then
he
suddenly
realizes
that
people
are
leaving
his
performance
to
see
something
in
a
bigger
setup.
Even
the
woman
he
loves
has
gone
for
the
person
who
runs
that
setup.
He
feels
that
everything
is
collapsing.
Both
the
film
won
National
Awards.
Bagh
Bahadur
won
the
National
Award
for
Best
Film.
Salim
Langde
Pe
Mat
Ro
won
for
Best
Hindi
film.
Both
the
films
were
appreciated
abroad.
Because
of
these
projects,
I
got
the
lead
role
in
the
BBC
film,
Brothers
in
Trouble.
For
Bagh
Bahadur,
it
would
take
hours
to
put
on
the
make
up
as
some
of
it
was
paint.
It
had
to
be
removed
with
kerosene.
Looking
back
at
all
the
efforts
put
in,
I
think
it
was
worth
it.
Tell
us
something
about
Brothers
in
Trouble...
My
work
always
got
me
work.
Someone
saw
one
film
and
offered
me
another.
Robert
Buckler
saw
Bagh
Bahadur
in
the
London
film
festival
and
then
offered
me
Brothers
in
Trouble.
Because
of
Brothers
in
Trouble,
I
got
a
small
role
in
1947:
Earth.
There
is
a
chain
of
your
work
getting
you
work.
As
an
artist,
it
feels
good
that
your
work
is
being
appreciated.
There
was
a
trend
of
such
low
budget,
offbeat
films
during
the
80's.
Do
you
think
that
genre
of
sensible
and
non-commercial
cinema
like
Salim
Langde
Pe
Mat
Ro,
Bagh
Bahadur,
Tarpan
or
Earth
doesn't
exist
now?
No
it
does.
With
time,
the
look
of
the
films
change
because
of
technique.
What
matters
is
the
attitude
behind
the
film.
Take
a
film
like
Munnabhai
M.B.B.S.
You
may
say
that
it
is
a
hardcore
commercial
film.
But
it
still
is
a
brilliant
film.
Film
making
in
itself
is
an
art.
We
can't
call
a
film
parallel
just
because
it
is
low
budget.
Omkara
is
a
brilliant
effort.
There
were
other
recent
films
like
Seher
and
Yahaan
which
were
great.
Black
was
an
experiment
in
a
hardcore
commercial
format.
New
people,
new
ideas
and
new
shooting
styles
are
coming
in.
Good
films
are
still
being
made.
You've
also
experimented
with
regional
films...
I
did
a
few
Telugu
films.
I
did
a
film
called
Aithe
for
which
I
won
a
Filmfare
and
their
State
Award.
It
was
a
villainous
role.
The
only
thing
that
was
difficult
was
the
language.
I
had
to
work
very
hard
because
I
didn't
know
that
language.
You
can
mug
the
dialogues
but
you
need
to
know
what
you're
saying.
But
on
the
whole,
I
enjoyed
that
stint
as
well,
since
it
was
a
different
experience.
How
was
it
working
with
Aamir
Khan
in
Earth?
It
was
very
good.
People
often
ask
me
how
it
is
to
work
with
stars.
I
have
worked
with
both
Aamir
and
Shahrukh
and
they're
just
like
any
other
normal
person
and
are
very
focused.
During
Earth,
the
unit
would
start
at
4:30
am.
Throughout
the
shooting,
it
has
never
happened
that
the
unit
was
kept
waiting
for
Aamir.
At
times
when
I
reached
on
sets,
he
was
already
there.
Why
did
we
see
so
less
of
you
post
Earth?
Weren't
you
happy
with
the
roles
you
were
offered?
I
think
you
should
ask
the
producers
that!
I
was
not
really
offered
anything
really
exciting.
As
an
actor,
I
can't
create
work
for
myself.
After
doing
the
kind
of
work
that
I
have,
all
I
asked
was
for
something
interesting.
I
don't
think
I'm
asking
for
too
much.
What
kind
of
roles
are
you
looking
out
for
in
the
future?
Anything
that
has
a
good
script.
My
role
should
be
important
in
the
script.
But
now
I
have
films
like
Pachas
lakh,
My
Name
is
Anthony
Gonsalves
and
Don.
Hopefully,
Black
Friday
should
release
soon.
As
an
actor,
I
am
constantly
looking
for
work.
What
do
you
prefer
-
theatre,
movies,
TV?
Once
I
shifted
to
Mumbai
from
Delhi,
I
didn't
do
theatre.
I
was
very
clear
that
I
wanted
to
be
a
part
of
films.
TV
started
at
that
time.
If
given
a
choice
to
do
my
previous
roles
for
TV
or
Cinema,
I
would
go
for
Cinema.
TV
is
a
box
at
home
with
the
lights
on
and
the
phone
ringing
in
the
background.
You
see
it
today
and
it's
gone
tomorrow.
I'm
lucky
to
have
been
a
part
of
Nukkad,
Zameen
Aasman
and
others.
People
still
talk
about
them.
Otherwise,
serials
are
gone.
It's
like
today
you
have
eaten
something
and
next
morning.
You
have
forgotten
the
taste.
For films, the audience is in one big dark hall. That experience is different altogether. Tomorrow if it a beta or a 16 mm running, that is different. The fact that 400-500 people sit in a dark hall and experience it is a whole different experience. I don't think TV can replace that. But as an actor when I say I am doing this particular serial I perform for the lens and the camera.
However, in the end if you are enjoying your work then any kind of medium is good.