Fresh
after
the
release
of
their
film,
we
put
our
directors
in
the
dock.
We
tell
them
what
critics
don't
like
about
their
film
and
give
them
a
chance
to
hit
back.
Next
in
the
series,
Raj
Kumar
Hirani
responds
to
criticism
against
Lage
Raho
Munnabhai.
CHARGE
1
It
has
been
said
that
bringing
Mahatma
Gandhi
into
your
plot
is
just
another
publicity
gimmick.
I
wasn't
a
huge
Gandhian
before
making
this
film.
But
I
started
reading
up
on
him
for
this
film.
It
required
a
lot
of
research.
That's
when
I
discovered
this
amazing
man.
His
simple
and
honest
principles
are
eminently
applicable
even
today.
Why
do
we
wait
for
others
to
change
the
world?
Why
can't
you
or
I
do
it?
You
know,
I
wasn't
scared
of
writing
the
script
of
Munnabhai
MBBS.
But
writing
the
script
of
Lage
Raho...,
where
I
had
to
introduce
Mahatma
Gandhi
into
the
plot,
was
scary.
But
the
humour
saved
the
film.
You
know,
Gandhiji
was
a
very
humorous
man.
But
I
still
took
a
big
risk
in
doing
a
film
where
Gandhi
was
one
of
the
characters.
CHARGE
2
Dilip
Prabhavalkar,
who
plays
Gandhi,
is
being
criticised
for
his
make-up
and
mannerisms.
Several
actors
including
Naseeruddin
Shah
were
auditioned
for
Gandhi's
role.
We
had
spoken
to
Naseer
who
was
interested.
But
he
got
busy
with
Krissh
and
his
own
directorial
venture.
Then
we
thought
of
Surendra
Rajan
who
had
played
Gandhi
in
Raj
Santoshi's
The
Legend
of
Bhagat
Singh.
We
finally
zeroed
in
on
theatre
and
television
actor
Dilip
Prabhavalkar
for
the
role.
Though
Dilip
had
done
his
home-work
he
couldn't
get
it
right
on
the
first
day.
We
told
him
to
stop
aping
Gandhiji
and
be
himself
because
the
attire
was
enough
to
suggest
whom
he
was
playing.
CHARGE
3
The
turning-the-other-cheek
philosophy
seems
outdated...
But
we
honestly
need
to
revise
our
ideological
stance.
Many
incidents
in
my
film
have
taken
place
in
real
life.
Take
the
scene
where
the
uncouth
man
repeatedly
spits
outside
the
neighbour's
door.
The
neighbour
cleans
the
spit
repeatedly
until
the
defaulting
man
is
shamed
into
stop
his
spitting.
This
incident
actually
happened
to
my
mother-in-law
but
in
her
case
the
neighbour
used
to
throw
eggshells
in
her
garden.
In
another
instance
a
couple
was
in
dispute
about
buying
a
flat
because
of
their
belief
in
vastu
shastra.
After
seeing
the
film
the
couple
decided
to
give
the
vastu
angle
the
slip
and
decided
to
go
ahead
and
buy
the
flat.
I
don't
think
the
first
film
had
that
kind
of
impact.
I'm
not
offering
Gandhism
as
a
full
and
final
solution.
But
it's
better
than
the
complete
erosion
of
ideology
in
today's
society.
CHARGE
4
Where
do
you
see
yourself
beyond
the
Munnabhai
series?
I
really
need
to
prove
myself
beyond
the
series.
Otherwise
my
well-wishers
will
turn
around
and
ask,
'Can
he
do
anything
else?'
Needless
to
say,
Sanju,
Arshad
and
I
have
a
responsibility
to
carry
forward
the
series.
Having
said
that,
Lage
Raho...
wasn't
a
sequel,
it's
an
independent
film.
But
I
need
to
get
away
from
these
two
guys.
I
must
say
Sanju
and
Arshad
worked
very
hard.
I
do
share
a
comfort
level
with
Sanju
and
Arshad.
And
it
would
be
stupid
to
let
go.
But
at
the
same
time
it
would
be
stupid
to
hold
on
to
them
for
the
sake
of
the
comfort
level.
But
let
me
tell
you
I'm
not
scared
of
doing
another
sequel.
When
I
did
Munnabhai
MBBS
they
said
comedies
don't
run.
When
I
did
a
sequel
to
MBBS
they
said
sequels
don't
run.
Now
they'll
say
sequel
kar
sakta
hai,
par
serious
film
nahin
bana
sakta.
CHARGE
5
Some
people
think
Lage
Raho
Munnabhai
trivialises
issues
dealt
with
in
Rang
De
Basanti
on
a
serious
note.
The
comparison
is
flattering;
no
matter
how
it's
made.
I'm
glad
Rakeysh
Mehra
had
the
guts
to
make
a
film
like
Rang
De
Basanti.
On
paper
it
must
have
looked
as
scary
as
Lage
Raho
Munnabhai.
Any
regular
producer
would've
said,
'Yeh
kya
hai,
Gandhi
aa
jata
hai...'
From
the
reactions
I've
got
so
far
I'd
say
this
film
has
gone
beyond
what
Munnabhai
achieved.
People
are
talking
in
superlatives.
But
just
to
assure
those
who
think
I
am
stuck
in
the
Munnabhai
mould,
my
next
is
a
non-Munnabhai
film
and
it's
a
serious
take
on
the
education
system.