By:
Joginder
Tuteja,
IndiaFM
Monday,
September
17,
2007
In
this
two
part
interview
with
Joginder
Tuteja,
Anant
Mahadevan
talks
from
nineteen
to
the
dozen
about
film
making
and
how
Hitchcock
inspires
him
when
it
comes
to
suspense
thrillers.
He
also
mentions
how
he
has
strived
for
bringing
a
difference
to
the
way
thrillers
are
made
with
a
wish
of
being
ultimately
considered
as
one
of
their
own
by
the
film
fraternity
which
still
considers
him
as
an
outsider.
Over
to
Mahadevan
in
Part
I
of
the
conversation:
"The
great
Hitchcock
had
said
that
as
a
film
maker,
you
should
plan
to
end
a
suspense
drama
in
such
a
manner
that
there
cannot
be
any
justified
alternate
ending",
reflects
Anant
Mahadevan
whose
suspense
thriller
Aggar
releases
this
Friday.
"This
is
why
I
take
inspiration
from
the
master
of
suspense
thrillers
(Hitchcock)
while
making
a
film
like
Aksar
or
Aggar",
says
Ananth
whose
third
in
the
trilogy
of
thrillers
is
called
Anjaam.
He
further
adds,
"Audiences
should
be
intrigued
by
what
they
see.
They
should
be
able
to
play
the
story
backward
after
watching
the
film
and
further
appreciate
in
retrospect.
Remember
how
the
character
of
Bruce
Willis
played
on
after
the
curtains
went
down
in
'The
Sixth
Sense'.
Now
that's
the
way
to
communicate
with
your
audience."
"After
the
suspense
of
AksarI
was
further
convinced
that
when
you
are
making
a
pure
suspense
thriller,
you
don't
have
to
always
make
a
whodunit.
Sometimes
a
how-done-it
or
a
why-done-it
turns
out
to
be
even
more
interesting!
In
Bollywood,
we
haven't
made
many
such
films
in
the
past.
Maybe
Ittefaq
from
the
60s
came
close",
says
the
learned
film
maker.
Talking
more
about
Aggar
he
says,
"Aggar
is
a
story
about
relationships.
It
is
about
the
big
and
the
small
things
that
happen
in
a
lifetime.
There
are
so
many
small
moments
when
one
tends
to
wonder
'what
if'!
What
if
love
turns
into
passion?
What
if
passion
turns
into
betrayal?
What
if
your
biggest
fear
comes
true?
These
are
some
of
the
areas
I
have
explored
in
the
film."
The
film
does
come
across
as
a
tout
thriller
with
Tusshar
and
Shreyas
making
for
interesting
leads.
"One
of
the
key
strengths
of
Aggar
is
it's
unique
casting.
I
would
have
loved
to
repeat
the
hit
pair
of
Aksar
-
Emraan
and
Dino
-
but
then
there
won't
have
been
much
of
surprise
element
left
for
the
audience.
Aksar
worked
because
no
one
saw
what
was
coming.
Dino
hardly
seemed
like
a
guy
who
was
capable
of
ruining
everyone
around
him",
he
talks
fondly
about
his
biggest
directorial
success
till
date.
"This
is
why
I
thought
of
Tusshar
and
Shreyas.
For
Tusshar,
it
is
a
unique
film
since
he
plays
a
gray
character
who
has
seen
darker
side
of
life
with
his
world
completely
shattered.
On
the
other
hand
you
never
know
what's
going
on
in
the
mind
of
Shreyas,
who
himself
plays
a
psychiatrist
in
the
film."
He
doesn't
forget
to
mention
about
the
film's
leading
ladies.
"Udita
would
be
seen
in
a
completely
different
role
than
Aksar.
She
has
a
complete
makeover
here
not
just
in
terms
of
the
character
she
plays
but
also
her
overall
look
and
styling.
Playing
a
young
woman
who
is
caught
in
the
biggest
dilemma
of
her
life,
she
has
done
a
phenomenal
job."
How
about
Sophie?
"She
plays
a
modern,
sophisticated
and
an
extremely
ambitious
girl
who
has
it
all.
She
plays
an
important
part
in
the
film
and
is
responsible
for
twisting
things
in
the
narrative",
says
Anant
in
a
controlled
manner
without
giving
any
hint
of
the
plot." His
first
attempt
at
remaking
a
film,
Victoria
No.
203,
may
have
been
a
disappointment
but
he
has
traditionally
tried
doing
things
differently
in
his
earlier
films
like
Dil
Vil
Pyaar
Vyaar
and
Dil
Maange
More
too.
There
are
stories
around
how
Aksarhad
some
of
the
most
terrible,
though
healthy
fights
during
script
development.
Laughs
Anant
wholeheartedly,
"My
writers
were
after
my
life
to
change
the
interval
point
of
the
film.
They
wanted
the
protagonists
(Dino
and
Emraan)
to
get
into
a
physical
fight
once
Emraan
threatens
to
walk
away
with
Udita.
They
couldn't
agree
to
the
fact
that
Dino
could
be
shown
as
so
calm
even
in
such
adverse
situation.
On
the
other
hand
for
me
that
was
the
beauty
of
the
script.
I
wanted
to
hold
on
to
all
the
'mardaangi'
of
a
hero
till
the
very
end,
and
that
too
without
him
even
delivering
a
punch.
Aksar
was
a
film
about
mind
games
and
it
was
best
for
people
to
fight
with
minds
and
not
hands.
I
am
glad
we
all
settled
down
to
the
vision
we
had
created
for
Aksar
and
it
went
down
well
with
the
audience
too."
Well,
what
has
been
his
vision
for
Aggar?
"As
you
would
realize
after
watching
the
film,
it's
an
entirely
different
way
in
which
the
film
has
been
directed",
he
mentions
while
reflecting
on
Tusshar's
dialogue
delivery,
"There
is
a
particular
manner
in
which
Tusshar
delivers
his
dialogues.
I
wanted
him
to
do
it
differently.
He
was
quite
apprehensive
to
begin
with
since
he
thought
he
was
underplaying
the
emotions.
He
also
wondered
if
it
was
all
being
too
'thanda'."
What
was
his
reaction
when
the
final
print
was
out?
"He
couldn't
believe
his
own
eyes
when
he
saw
the
final
outcome.
He
had
come
up
with
an
entirely
different
pattern
of
speech
which
goes
so
well
with
his
character
in
the
film.
Any
other
actor
may
have
made
a
mess
out
of
it
but
it
was
just
a
matter
of
Tusshar's
getting
enough
conviction
and
belief
in
himself
to
achieve
what
turned
out
to
be
the
ultimate
product."