"There's no relationship between Ash and me" - Abhishek
How
different
are
you
and
your
father
in
Sarkar
Raj
as
compared
with
Sarkar?
In
Sarkar
Raj,
Pa
would
be
seen
with
an
added
slouch.
Pa
had
to
be
shown
aged
since
the
first
part
of
the
film.
Time
has
passed
and
we
see
it
in
his
performance,
and
mine.
My
character
has
more
responsibility
on
his
shoulders.
Earlier
my
character
was
hungry
and
lean
eager
to
prove
himself.
Now
I'm
a
more
a
confident
and
successful
man.
I
believe
you've
put
on
weight
for
the
role?
I
have.
We
wanted
to
show
Shankar
Nagre
as
not
heavy,
but
healthier
than
he
was
in
the
first
part…as
a
successful
well-settled
man.
Even
my
clothes
in
Sarkar
Raj
have
changed.
In
Sarkar,
I
was
more
casually
dressed.
In
Sarkar
Raj,
I'm
more
formally
attired
in
a
suit
all
through.
You
know
more
about
sequels
than
your
colleagues?
Sarkar
Raj
isn't
my
first
sequel.
I've
also
done
Dhoom
2.
But
there's
a
difference.
For
Dhoom
2,
Aditya
Chopra's
brief
was
to
take
the
brand
further.
He
wanted
to
make
the
sequel
bigger
and
better.
Otherwise,
he
reasoned,
why
would
they
come
to
see
it?
Sarkar
Raj
on
the
other
hand,
moved
the
other
way.
It's
not
a
candyfloss
entertainer.
We
had
to
be
true
to
the
original
characters.
The
characters
moved
in
a
specific
direction
from
the
first
part
to
the
second.
So
there
has
to
be
a
lot
of
intensity
in
the
presentation.
In
Sarkar
Raj,
we
couldn't
afford
the
liberties
that
we
could
in
Dhoom
2.
Experimenting with body language and weight are now a part of your acting grammar. I guess today, an actor has to work hard to be noticed. So does the director. In Sarkar Raj, it's not just my character's weight that has changed. The house the characters live in has become more plush.
This
time
you
take
centre
stage
in
the
drama?
I
disagree.
Sarkar
is
Subhash
Nagre
which
is
dad's
character.
But
now
Shankar
is
running
the
family
business.
But
his
father
is
still
the
head
of
the
family.
So
we're
in
it
together."
But
you
and
Aishwarya
are
not
a
couple
in
Sarkar
Raj?
Does
that
matter
to
the
audience?
Once
the
lights
go
down
in
the
theatre
the
audience
becomes
one
with
the
characters.
If
they
don't
it's
my
failing
as
an
actor.
They
will
be
swept
away
with
the
characters.
Whether
we're
married
or
a
couple
in
the
film
is
of
no
consequence.
I
think
such
cheap
publicity
gimmicks
don't
work.
And
yes
we
haven't
tried
to
hide
the
fact
that
we
aren't
a
couple
in
the
film.
No
point
in
lying
to
the
audience.
In
fact,
there's
no
relationship
between
Aishwarya
and
me
in
Sarkar
Raj.
And
that
should
be
no
problem.
Just
because
we're
husband
and
wife
doesn't
mean
we
should
play
the
same
roles
in
all
our
films.
But
what
about
the
strong
media
-created
image
of
you
as
a
couple?
No,
I'm
convinced
the
audience
isn't
going
to
take
that
factor
into
consideration.
My
father
and
I
do
play
father
and
son
in
Sarkar
Raj.
But
we
weren't
related
at
all
in
Bunty
Aur
Babli.
In
fact,
he
was
hunting
me
down
throughout
the
film.
And
yet
it
was
a
resounding
success.
How
much
have
you
evolved
as
an
actor
since
Sarkar?
I'd
like
to
think
my
character
has
evolved
since
the
first
part
and
that
I've
evolved
accordingly.
But
like
I
said,
Jai
Dixit
could
change
his
looks
and
clothes
from
Dhoom
to
Dhoom
2.
I
don't
think
it'd
look
believable
to
see
me
in
a
t-shirt,
jeans
and
clean-shaven
in
Sarkar
Raj.
As
for
myself,
without
sounding
arrogant
I'd
like
to
say
I
think
I've
evolved
as
an
actor.
I'm
still
learning
and
I'll
be
learning
till
the
day
I'm
an
actor.
Look
at
my
father
at
65.
He
continues
to
evolve.
In
comparison
to
him
there's
a
long
way
to
go.
I'd
like
to
believe
I'm
evolving.