2007
saw
him
reaching
the
pinnacle
of
success
with
four
successful
albums
in
a
row
-
Life
In
A
Metro,
Jab
We
Met,
Bhool
Bhulaiyaa
and
Dhan
Dhana
Dhan
Goal.
However,
as
has
been
the
case
with
the
prolific
composer
ever
since
he
created
'dhoom'
with
'Dhoom
Macha
Le'
[Dhoom],
his
career
has
been
mired
with
charges
of
plagiarism
month
after
month.
Though
the
composer
had
admitted
about
his
source
of
inspiration
and
reasons
behind
similarities
in
a
few
cases,
some
of
the
recent
developments
have
left
him
completely
baffled,
shocked
and
above
all
disappointed!
Reason?
He
has
been
charged
with
lifting
from
a
Bengali
song
for
one
of
his
compositions
in
Magna
Films'
Bhram
when
the
fact
is
that
Pritam
has
officially
bought
all
the
rights
for
the
original
source
of
the
song.
Unable
to
control
his
anger,
Pritam
fumes,
"I
hate
mud
slinging,
but
this
allegation
is
baseless
and
demeaning.
It
is
being
purposely
done
to
make
a
controversy
and
promote
the
film.
Yes,
the
song
in
question
here,
'Jaane
Kyun
Tanha
Ho
Gaye',
is
indeed
an
adaptation
but
all
the
necessary
paperwork
has
been
done
to
make
it
legal.
For
the
original
number
'Ghare
Pheraar
Gaan',
I
myself
went
ahead
and
bought
the
copyright
from
Asha
Audio
by
spending
my
own
money."
There
is
a
different
version
floating
from
the
production
house
though.
As
per
Magna
Films,
it
was
only
a
day
before
the
music
release
of
Bhram
that
they
discovered
that
'Jaane
Kyun',
was
actually
an
inspiration.
"What
rubbish",
wonders
Pritam,
"Director
Pawan
Kaul
liked
the
particular
song
'Ghare
Pheraar
Gaan'
and
wanted
it
in
the
film.
He
all
along
knew
that
it
is
a
Bengali
song
by
late
Gautam
Chatterjee.
Possibly
Magna
Films
was
not
informed
about
this
but
Pawan
knew
this
all
along.
Since
my
prime
point
of
contact
was
Pawan,
he
should
have
kept
Magna
people
in
loop."
Continues
Pritam
in
an
exasperated
tone,
"I
guess
it
keeps
happening
to
me
all
the
time
and
because
I
do
not
open
up
my
mouth,
there
seems
to
be
an
open
opportunity
for
anyone
and
everyone.
I
choose
to
keep
quite
because
I
don't
want
any
dirty
linen
to
be
washed
in
public.
A
lot
happens
in
the
industry
and
it
is
always
in
the
best
of
everyone's
interest
that
people
avoid
indulging
in
cross
fires.
But
this
time
I
had
to
speak
up."
From
where
is
the
entire
issue
stemming
from?
"Search
me",
says
Pritam
while
raising
his
hands
in
air,
"After
completion
of
this
project,
I
tried
calling
Mr.
Pawan
Kaul
umpteen
times
to
know
what
was
happening
on
the
album
because
I
wanted
proper
credits
to
be
given
to
Gautamda.
I
had
no
contact
with
the
producers
as
I
was
mostly
dealing
with
Mr.
Kaul."
"In
fact,
I
had
no
clue
whatsoever
about
what
was
happening
with
the
song
unless
I
saw
the
poster
of
Bhram
on
a
bus.
That
is
when
I
realized
that
the
movie
and
music
were
getting
ready
for
release," informs
Pritam,
"Since
I
wasn't
getting
a
concrete
response
from
Mr.
Kaul,
I
requested
him
to
pass
me
on
the
contacts
at
Magna
Films."
Did
the
conversation
help?
"There
was
further
shock
in
store
for
me
as
I
got
to
know
from
them
that
the
music
of
Bhram
was
to
be
released
on
the
market
in
a
day.
My
worst
fears
came
true
as
I
realized
that
there
was
indeed
no
credit
to
Gautamda
on
the
CD."
How
could
this
have
happened
considering
the
fact
that
a
proper
contract
had
been
signed
to
procure
the
number?
"I
seriously
don't
know
what
made
the
producers
refrain
from
having
the
credits
on
the
album
cover.
There
was
a
blame
game
happening
where
Mr.
Kaul
said
that
he
had
given
instructions
to
Magna
Films
while
their
representatives
said
that
they
had
no
clue
about
any
such
developments."
" On
my
request,
Times
Music
later
agreed
to
delay
the
music
launch
by
a
few
days
so
that
they
could
put
a
label
next
to
the
song
with
the
relevant
credit.
Of
course,
they
couldn't
replace
the
cover
with
a
new
one
and
I
was
ok
to
have
at
least
a
label
carrying
the
credits.
The
issue
was
settled
and
it
was
in
fact
I
who
was
on
the
front
foot,
as
I
wanted
the
right
people
to
get
credit.
However,
what
I
see
is
tables
being
turned
on
me
for
no
rhyme
or
reason,"
says
Pritam
in
a
disappointing
tone.
Maybe
Kaul
thought
that
Pritam's
name
in
the
controversy
would
help
the
film.
Laughs
Pritam,
"It's
quite
funny
if
that
was
the
case.
If
Mr.
Kaul
thought
that
I
was
such
a
big
star
that
he
could
promote
the
film
through
me,
he
should
have
taken
me
as
the
hero!"
"
I
am
clueless
why
Mr.
Kaul
had
to
drag
me
into
this.
Primarily,
I
gave
all
the
time
to
him
and
when
he
bounced
a
song
after
full
recording
(even
though
after
approving
it
on
the
melody
level),
I
didn't
react
or
ask
any
money
for
it.
Secondly,
I
was
not
paid
any
hefty
money
because
one
year
back
I
was
charging
very
less.
Thirdly,
even
when
I
had
taken
all
the
rights
for
the
song
while
keeping
Mr.
Kaul
informed
all
along,
where
is
the
question
of
him
or
the
producers
finding
out
about
the
source?
It
is
disgusting!"
Mr.
Lahiri
-
Asha
audio
"I
don't
understand
why
Pritam
is
being
dragged
into
this.
He
bought
the
rights
from
us
and
is
now
setting
up
our
song
to
gain
popularity
across
globe.
This
happened
months
back
and
it
surprises
me
that
all
of
a
sudden
people
out
there
are
trying
to
malign
his
name.
Quite
sad.
He
is
a
gentle
soul
and
when
he
is
genuinely
right,
he
is
unnecessarily
being
cornered."
Ms.
Shikha
Singhi
-
Head
of
Films
Aquistion,
Times
Music
"I
am
aware
that
he
had
communicated
to
Pawan
Kaul
about
the
song
being
bought
from
the
original
artiste.
I
understand
that
Pritam
trusted
Kaul
to
inform
us
about
this.
However,
we
were
not
aware
about
it
until
the
first
copy
of
the
CD
was
ready
to
be
out.
In
fact,
the
moment
Pritam
came
to
know
that
there
were
crediting
issues,
he
immediately
requested
us
to
get
the
stock
back.
We
knew
that
he
was
doing
the
right
thing
and
supported
him.
This
is
why
we
even
delayed
the
music
launch
by
2-3
days
and
got
the
label
on
the
album
cover
citing
the
credits.
In
fact,
Pritam
had
even
offered
to
pay
for
the
losses
that
Times
Music
would
have
incurred
due
to
CDs
being
called
back
We
at
Times
Music
have
absolutely
no
problems
and
see
this
as
a
non-issue!
This
should
settle
the
case
once
for
an
all!"