"The era of playback singing should come to an end" - Shaan
He is one of the frontline playback singers of the millennium - and listing his hits would occupy too much space. But Shaan says that playback singing, in the truest sense, seems to be going out of fashion
Till
2008,
you
were
pretty
prolific
in
films.
Have
you
consciously
scaled
down
your
playback
work?
The
last
big
setup
film
for
which
I
have
sung
is
Dostana
for
which
I
rendered
Kuchh
kam.
Before
that,
I
had
films
like
Race,
Kismet
Konnection,
Love
Story
2050,
Drona
and
several
songs
in
Ek
Vivaah...Aisa
Bhi.
But
trends
are
changing.
Today,
music
directors
and
filmmakers
are
consciously
not
touching
the
regular
voices
like
KK,
Kunal
Ganjawala,
Sonu
Nigam,
Udit
Narayanji
and
me.
Do
you
see
this
as
a
passing
phase
or
a
new,
lasting
scenario?
I
don't
know.
As
long
as
everyone
out
there
is
happy,
it
will
last.
But
if
this
trend
is
prolonged,
we
will
benefit
because
by
that
time
we
will
no
longer
remain
regular
singers!
(Laughs)On
the
plus
side,
we
are
seeing
a
few
nice
melodies
and
a
part-revival
in
lyrics
that
have
now
gone
beyond
pyar,
dil
and
diwana.
Do
you
really
see
a
revival
of
lyrics?
There
is
only
a
lot
of
English
and
Punjabi
and
virtually
no
new
thoughts
or
depth.
On
reflection,
yes,
I
agree
with
you
that
it
is
more
about
newness
and
smart
word-play
rather
than
actual
improvement
or
more
substance.
(Smiles
wryly)
How
much
has
this
affected
you
personally?
For
me,
it's
a
nice,
relaxed
phase
-
and
I
am
still
recording
something
every
day.
A
lot
of
my
work
is
with
new
and
nameless
music
directors
and
for
me
that
translates
as
a
lot
more
space
and
freedom
as
they
are
very
receptive
to
my
inputs
about
lyrics,
music,
vocal
nuances
and
so
on.
You
have
been
always
known
and
even
admired
by
music
directors
as
a
singer
who
gives
creative
inputs
to
your
songs.
I
think
that
a
singer
must
offer
his
honest
inputs
in
a
positive
way.
For
one,
I
have
to
keep
myself
fresh
and
non-repetitious.
For
another,
once
a
song
is
done,
it's
done,
so
if
I
can
suggest
improvement
to
any
specific
aspect,
why
shouldn't
I
do
so
before
the
song
takes
shape
for
posterity?
Your
observation
about
regular
playback
singers
being
avoided
is
bang-on.
What
do
you
think
about
everyone
from
actors,
pop
singers
and
raw
voices
to
music
directors
themselves
increasingly
facing
the
microphone?
(Shrugs)
I
do
not
want
to
sound
as
if
grapes
are
sour
for
me.
But
I
sometimes
feel
that
the
era
of
playback
singing
should
come
to
an
end.
Softwares
that
ensure
that
actors
sound
perfect
make
even
stars
seem
perfectly
in
sur
-
not
just
here
but
also
in
Hollywood.
Remember
that
the
playback
system
began
because
actors
could
not
sing!!
Today,
music
directors
are
even
singing
for
each
other.
Maybe
they
are
feeling
the
pinch
that
thanks
to
stage-shows
being
on
the
rise,
a
song
is
known
by
either
the
actor
or
the
singer
and
not
as
their
creations!
Yes,
I
am
happy
that
today's
composers
are
genuinely
friends
with
each
other,
but
let's
face
it,
playback
singing
is
a
specialised
job
with
a
lot
of
thought
given
to
a
song,
apart
from
the
brief
from
the
song's
creators!
Maybe
it's
all
about
song-budgets?
I
don't
think
so.
The
composers
who
are
singing
themselves
are
all
big
names,
so
such
constraints
are
unlikely.
Besides,
how
much
do
we
singers
charge
anyway?
No,
I
see
this
as
a
specific
trend.
Okay,
playback
singing,
we
concur,
is
a
specialised
job.
What
else
do
you
have
to
say?
A
film
song,
to
me,
is
an
expression
of
the
emotions
of
a
character
in
a
situation.
Therefore
it
should
touch
the
heart.
The
right
nuances
should
be
there
and
that
requires
gaayaki.
Look
at
a
lot
of
Jatin-Lalit's
songs,
for
example,
in
the
'90s
-
they
had
these
qualities,
the
singers
were
cast
in
the
right
manner
and
the
songs
were
so
simple
that
you
could
have
removed
all
the
instruments
and
still
cherished
the
vocals
and
the
tunes.
To
me,
any
form
of
art
-
including
poetry
and
music
-
should
by
definition
be
about
beauty
and
should
reflect
it.
These
qualities
cannot
be
overlooked,
but
they
are
being
sidetracked.
There
are
so
many
alarming
areas
as
well.
Explain.
We
are
having
voices
who
have
atrocious
diction.
If
proper
diction
has
to
be
dispensed
with,
it
can
be
done
in
an
exceptional
case
dictated
by
character
or
situation,
not
as
a
norm!
Agar
ucchaaran
theek
nahin
hai
to
hum
gaane
ko
samajh
hi
nahin
paayenge
(We
cannot
understand
the
words
if
the
pronunciation
is
incorrect)!
Which
is
what
is
happening
too
frequently
nowadays,
and
everyone
is
being
encouraged
because
a
few
such
songs
work
big-time,
or
are
said
to
have
done
so
because
they
are
promoted
on
television
and
radio!
There
is
no
effort
to
correct
this,
because
no
one
cares!
Another
area
of
trouble
is
that
besura
singing
is
ignored
or
found
"cute" and
excuses
like
'natural
raw
voice'
and
'novelty'
are
given.
Obviously,
the
more
conscientious
people
use
pitch-correction
software
for
these
kind
of
voices.
So
when
singers
like
us
are
recording
and
find
ourselves
imperfect
at
points,
the
music
directors
are
resistant
to
pitch-correction
for
us,
because
they
feel
we
are
better!
But
if
pitch-correction
can
help
good
singers
sound
even
better,
I
feel
that
it
should
be
used!
What
about
suitability
of
voice
to
actor?
Again
by
definition,
playback
means
a
voice
that
seems
to
be
coming
from
an
actor's
mouth!
I
feel
consternation
when
I
hear
or
read
of
someone
saying
proudly,
"Things
have
opened
up
now!
A
voice
need
not
match
the
actor!"
I
find
it
illogical.
Almost
a
decade
ago,
I
had
recorded
Toone
mujhe
pehchaana
nahin
for
Ajay
Devgan
in
Raju
Chacha.
But
when
I
watched
the
film,
I
was
aghast!
I
realised
that
my
thin
voice
wasn't
suiting
Ajay
at
all!
From
that
time,
I
have
always
made
a
special
effort
-
whenever
I
know
which
actor
the
song
will
go
on
screen
-
to
modulate
my
voice.
I
have
sung
for
Ajay
in
some
songs
later
and
you
can
see
the
results
in
those
songs,
like
in
Masti.
I
think
that
this
is
not
an
"opening
up"
but
an
indifferent,
easy
way
out!
True.
Sometimes
even
the
compositions
do
not
fit
the
mood
of
the
respective
song.
You said it - and some of these songs are superhits !! It's bizarre. I think that certain basic fundamentals should not be changed just for the sake of change.
Do
you
think
that
if
they
had
their
way,
they
would
change
the
order
of
the
alphabet
and
numbers
just
to
change
something!
(Laughs)
Yes.
There
is
this
recent
soundtrack
that
has
made
a
lot
of
waves
along
with
the
film
-
but
it
had
everything
wrong
with
it
but
worked!
Moreover,
most
good
playback
singers
are
versatile,
but
today,
if
you
are
an
all-rounder
and
advertise
the
fact,
you
could
be
in
great
trouble,
because
the
need
today
is
of
singers,
composers
and
lyricists
who
only
have
a
specific
forte!
How
have
you
adapted
to
this
hopefully-transient
scenario?
Well,
I
have
never
said
things
like,
"Singing
is
my
bloodline,
so
I
breathe
music,
live
music
or
exist
only
for
music!"
So
all
this
has
given
me
the
opportunity
to
try
out
other
avenues
of
my
personality,
like
freaking
out
on
a
television
show
that
has
nothing
to
do
with
music.
The
graph
will
always
be
downward,
which
is
why
the
average
song
of
yore
will
always
be
the
masterpiece
of
today!
As
entertainment
gets
broader,
all
this
is
bound
to
happen
and
one
must
be
prepared
for
it.
But
yes,
film
music
and
playback
singing
automatically
have
certain
prerequisites
and
it's
not
nice
to
know
that
those
are
being
defiled.