Priyadarshan
is
not
known
for
going
overtly
gaga
about
his
films.
However,
when
it
comes
to
De
Dana
Dan,
he
is
taking
a
strong
stand
in
support
of
the
film.
Extremely
content
with
the
way
the
film
has
shaped
up,
Priyarashan
is
also
happy
with
the
fact
that
De
Dana
Dan
targets
family
audiences,
is
free
of
any
double
entendres
and
doesn't
underestimate
its
audiences.
With
the
film
being
a
few
hours
away
from
release,
Priyadarshan
talks
to
us
about
the
originality
of
De
Dana
Dan,
his
love
for
Akshay
and
of
course
the
much-in-news
rain
dance
featuring
Katrina
Kaif.
You
have
never
sounded
so
gung
ho
about
a
film
of
yours?
And
that's
because
I
can
never
recreate
the
kind
of
ultimate
confusion
that
you
would
see
in
the
film.
It
is
one
of
the
funniest
comedies
that
I
have
made
and
everything
has
fitted
in
just
right.
Yes,
I
am
quite
positive
about
its
prospects;
more
so
because
we
are
targeting
family
audiences
with
De
Dana
Dan.
In
that
case,
why
a
soaked
Katrina
in
a
rain
dance?
I
don't
remember
the
last
time
when
we
saw
a
rain
love
song
in
a
film
of
yours.
Did
you
ever
feel
that
it
was
a
compromise
of
sorts
since
otherwise
your
film
is
a
complete
laugh
entertainer?
See,
the
whole
intention
of
the
movie
is
an
entertainer
so
why
not
let
all
segments
of
audiences
be
happy?
Let's
admit
it;
Katrina
is
one
of
the
most
sensuous
looking
girls
in
the
industry
today.
The
idea
is
to
exploit
this
factor
but
in
a
nice
way.
As
long
as
something
like
shooting
a
rain
song
is
done
aesthetically,
nothing
looks
vulgar.
But
then
there
is
always
that
thin
line,
right?
Yes,
there
is
a
thin
line
that
crosses
vulgarity,
which
makes
it
further
interesting
to
shoot
a
song
correctly.
Moreover,
I
didn't
really
think
much
about
the
song
making
news
in
this
way.
The
film
is
a
laugh
entertainer
and
there
lies
its
core
strength.
In
fact
I
remember
that
at
one
point
of
time
in
your
career,
you
were
not
too
inclined
towards
incorporating
'item
songs'
in
your
films.
Like
in
Hera
Pheri,
you
led
a
tirade
against
producer
Firoz
Nadiadwala
since
he
incorporated
songs
like
'Jab
Bhi
Koi
Haseena'
and
'Tun
Tunak
Tun'
at
the
last
minute.
And
you
would
also
remember
that
the
songs
were
removed
from
the
prints
within
few
days
itself.
They
never
fitted
into
the
narrative.
See,
most
of
the
times,
I
don't
push
a
song
into
the
narrative
for
the
sake
of
it.
Even
in
Hera
Pheri,
the
songs
were
added
without
my
permission.
I
was
upset
with
the
decision
and
hadn't
even
shot
them.
I
have
always
believed
that
all
my
songs
have
to
be
in
flow
of
the
film;
only
then
can
they
be
successful.
Coming
to
your
choice
of
actors,
for
a
movie
which
is
entirely
made
of
dozens
of
characters,
didn't
you
feel
that
adding
in
a
Katrina
Kaif
would
be
a
distraction
since
audiences
may
start
expecting
a
lot
more
of
her
as
well?
No
I
didn't,
because
Katrina
isn't
there
just
for
the
sake
of
it.
She
is
also
playing
an
important
element
in
the
film,
just
as
is
the
case
with
Akshay,
Paresh,
Suniel
or
so
many
other
characters
in
the
film.
When
you
see
the
film,
you
would
realise
that
every
character
misunderstands
another
character
and
is
running
around
with
an
agenda
of
his
own.
Moreover,
there
is
enough
romance
in
the
film
as
well
which
makes
Katrina's
presence
important.
How
about
Akshay
Kumar?
At
the
end
of
the
day,
despite
so
many
characters,
isn't
he
the
pivotal
element
in
De
Dana
Dan?
Whether
it
is
Bhagam
Bhag
or
the
original
Hera
Pheri,
the
most
important
person
in
the
narrative
is
Akshay.
And
then
other
characters
make
it
more
and
more
hilarious.
Also,
without
Akshay,
we
cannot
afford
to
make
a
big
film
like
De
Dana
Dan.
But
does
roping
him
in
and
in
turn
making
a
big
film
suffice?
Certainly
not.
We
have
to
look
at
the
script
and
can't
really
depend
upon
the
star.
Finally
people
have
to
watch
the
film
and
they
will
be
merciless
enough
to
reject
it
if
the
movie
is
not
going
as
per
their
expectations.
Yes,
Akshay
is
a
crowd
puller
but
post
that,
it
is
the
film
in
entirety
that
does
the
talking.
One
wonders
though
if
due
to
heavy
weight
presence
of
Akshay,
Suniel,
Paresh
and
Katrina,
whether
Neha
Dhupia
and
Sameera
Reddy
would
lose
out...
You
can't
take
them
out
of
the
narrative
at
all.
It
is
because
of
characters
like
the
one
they
enact
that
the
entire
confusion
is
created.
In
fact
they
enhance
the
confusion
to
great
levels.
When
I
look
back,
I
feel
that
I
have
shot
some
of
my
best
situations
in
De
Dana
Dan.
You
can't
really
predict
the
film.
It's
a
complete
comedy
of
poverty.
Comedy
of
poverty?
Something
that
has
been
your
strength
over
the
years?
I
remember
Malamaal
Weekly,
Yeh
Tera
Ghar
Yeh
Mera,
Hera
Pheri,
Billu,
Hungama
and
many
other
films
of
yours
having
poverty
as
a
central
element.
That's
true,
because
poverty
is
one
element
that
is
felt
strongly
by
the
masses.
They
can
relate
to
it.
In
De
Dana
Dan
too,
we
have
got
looserish
characters
like
the
ones
played
by
Akshay
and
Suniel.
Their
girlfriends
are
super
rich
but
these
two
men
don't
have
a
single
penny
of
their
own.
Like
any
other
looser,
they
have
nothing
to
loose
and
due
to
this
very
comfort
feel,
they
end
up
committing
an
innocent
crime.
They
turn
kidnappers.
Lastly,
is
De
Dana
Dan
a
remake?
Fortunately
it
is
not
(laughs).
Just
like
the
way
one
of
my
favourite
films,
Malamaal
Weekly
wasn't
a
remake.
These
things
don't
matter
eventually.
What
finally
matters
is
that
people
should
enjoy
the
film
and
producer
should
make
his
money.