If
only
he
had,
Govinda
would
be
able
to
'connect'
with
his
Raavan
director's
vision
for
the
film.
It's
easy
to
say
he
doesn't
mind
his
role
being
chopped
now.
After
all,
Mani
matters
on
your
resume,
no?
Govinda,
who
plays
a
Hanuman-like
character
in
Mani
Ratnam's
Raavan,
was
in
shock
when
he
saw
the
film
last
week.
Though
he's
been
telling
his
friends
that
he
didn't
expect
this
shoddy
treatment
from
the
filmmaker
who
edited
out
most
of
his
role,
he
poses
a
brave
front
for
the
media.
However,
when
we
talk
to
him,
one
can
read
between
the
lines
that
express
his
disappointment.
Your
reaction
on
seeing
Raavan?
I
was
stunned
after
seeing
Raavan.
I
couldn't
connect
spiritually
to
the
film.
It
is
too
commercial.
In
the
original
Ramayana
koi
kisi
ka
paksh
nahi
le
raha
hai.
That's
why
it
comes
across
as
balanced.
We
connect
to
it
on
an
emotional
level
and
spiritual
level.
In
Raavan
that's
not
the
way
it
is.
But
I
never
told
Mani
Sir
anything.
How
can
I
question
a
big
director
like
him?
Were
you
expecting
your
role
to
be
cut
so
much?
All
I
can
say
is
that
I
learnt
a
lot
from
Mani
sir
and
his
way
of
working.
I
did
the
film
because
of
Sunita.
When
Mani
sir
offered
me
the
role
he
said
he
wanted
someone
who
looks
strong
and
is
wise
-
someone
who
tried
to
convince
Raavan
that
violence
and
fights
are
not
the
right
ways
to
achieve
things.
When
I
asked
Sunita,
she
said
I
should
do
the
role
because
I
don't
have
amicable
relations
with
anyone.
She
felt
I
should
do
it
for
Abhishek
even
if
it
was
a
multi-starrer.
Did
you
read
the
script?
No.
Once
I
decided
to
do
the
film
I
also
decided
I
wouldn't
ask
a
word
about
my
role
or
question
the
director
on
anything.
I
would
do
whatever
Mani
sir
wants
me
to
do
unquestioningly
and
I
came
on
time
every
day
we
shot.
Most
people
feel
that
all
characters
except
Abhi-Ash
were
sidelined.
Comment.
I
signed
the
film
knowing
Mani
sir
was
making
Raavan
and
not
Ramayana
and
that
it
would
be
from
the
point
of
view
of
the
anti-hero,
Raavan.
I
knew
the
focus
would
be
on
Raavan.
I
needed
the
role.
I
learnt
what
I
needed
to
from
it
and
that's
it.
Actors
should
not
think
so
much.
I
accept,
act,
forget
and
move
on
to
my
next
film.
I
never
question
the
powers
that
be.
Did
you
reveal
your
feelings
to
Mani?
No.
Unless
he
calls
me,
how
can
I
question
Mani
sir
about
this?
He's
such
a
big
person
and
a
school
in
himself.
I
didn't
want
even
the
technical
team
to
take
sides.
It
is
believed
you
felt
sidelined
during
the
shooting?
If
I
did,
I
didn't
mind.
I
don't
allow
these
things
to
ruin
my
peace
of
mind.
I
used
the
experiences
to
learn.
I
would
sit
by
myself
and
keep
learning
the
process.
I
never
allowed
such
things
to
spoil
my
day
or
mood.
Who
do
you
blame
for
the
role
being
chopped?
Why
blame
anyone
for
chopping
my
role?
I
didn't
ask
anybody
before
signing
it.
I
have
done
148
films
till
now
and
have
understood
that
one
shouldn't
focus
on
such
things.
Do
your
work,
get
out
and
forget
about
the
film.
It's
a
kind
of
self-defense
mechanism
I
have
learnt
and
adopted
over
the
years.
If
Mani
offers
a
film
again
will
you
do
it?
(After
a
long
pause)
Any
time
I
get
a
good
role
to
perform,
I
will
do
it.
I
am
a
selfish
actor.
What
I
have
learnt
is
that
khud
se
pyaar
karo...
khud
ka
dhyan
rakho...
kisi
aur
pe
comment
na
karo.
Story first published: Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 14:10 [IST]