Filmmaker
R
Balki's
take
on
nepotism
has
taken
the
internet
by
storm.
While
speaking
to
a
leading
daily,
R
Balki
had
said,
"The
question
is
do
they
(star
kids)
have
an
unfair
or
bigger
advantage?
Yes,
there
are
pros
and
cons.
But
I'd
ask
one
simple
question: Find
me
a
better
actor
than
Alia
(Bhatt)
or
Ranbir
(Kapoor),
and
we'll
argue.
It's
unfair
on
these
few
people
who're
probably
some
of
the
finest
actors."
While
netizens
slammed
Balki
for
his
take
on
nepotism,
his
colleague
filmmaker
Anubhav
Sinha
has
something
different
to
say.
Anubhav
took
to
Twitter
to
share
his
stand
on
the
nepotism
debate
and
wrote,
"I
don't
think
Balki
meant
Ranbir
and
Alia
are
the
best
actors
right
now.
They
aren't.
There
is
no
yardstick
to
compare
two
good
actors.
I
think
what
he
meant
was
that
they
are
both
truly
deserving
stars
despite
their
illustrious
pedigree.
And
I
agree
with
that."
Anubhav's
nuanced
take
on
Balki's
statement
received
different
reactions
from
the
netizens.
While
some
agreed
with
the
Thappad
director,
others
criticised
the
filmmaker
for
his
stand.
A
user
wrote,
"But
sir
the
fight
isn't
against
them.
The
fight
is
against
the
Sonam
Kapoor,
Arjun
Kapoor,
etc
of
BW
who
are
not
deserving
stars
and
we
keep
seeing
them
in
movie
after
movie
even
after
we
as
an
audience
keep
rejecting
them."
Another
user
wrote,
"I'm
sure
his
one
line
has
been
pulled
out
of
context
and
has
been
sensationalised.
But
we
need
to
address
that
this
so
called
'war'
is
not
against
the
star
kids.
But
the
ask
is
to
be
inclusive
of
the
'outsiders'
and
provide
them
with
a
level
playing
field."
"True
Relieved
face
there
are
many
good
actors
and
Ranbir
and
Alia
are
two
of
them.
He
want
to
say
stop
blaming
because
They
achieved
on
their
own.
Stop
judging
any
one
from
their
filmy
background
if
they
are
good
actors
nothing
matters
more.
Don't
known
when
will
people
understand
this," replied
another
netizen.
Another
user,
who
disagreed
with
Sinha's
take
on
nepotism,
wrote,
"The
whole
conversation
has
moved
to
acting
abilities
which
is
rightly
not
the
case
-
it's
about
the
accessibility
to
get
a
role
-
that's
all
it
is.
The
so
called
insiders
have
only
a
handful
of
good
actors
and
the
majority
of
them
are
the
outsiders
which
are
good."
What's
your
take
on
the
entire
fiasco?
Share
your
thoughts
in
the
comments
section
below.