Bombay HC Suggests Statutory Body To Regulate TV News Content?
On Monday, the Bombay High Court sought to know from the Union government why there should not be a statutory body to regulate the content broadcast through television news channels
On
Monday,
the
Bombay
High
Court
sought
to
know
from
the
Union
government
why
there
should
not
be
a
statutory
body
to
regulate
the
content
broadcast
through
television
news
channels,
and
asked
why
the
electronic
media
has
been
given
an
"open-hand" in
its
coverage.
The
dialogue
started
while
hearing
a
bunch
of
Public
Interest
Litigations
(PILs)
against
the
press,
due
to
the
media
coverage
around
actor
Sushant
Singh
Rajput's
death
and
the
case
investigation.
The
HC
bench
comprising
of
Chief
Justice
Dipankar
Datta
and
Justice
GS
Kulkarni
asked,
"Is
there
a
statutory
mechanism
for
(TV
news)
broadcasters?"
and
added,
"Just
as
how
the
Press
Council
of
India
exists
for
the
print
media,
why
don't
you
(Union
government)
think
of
a
similar
council
for
the
electronic
media?
Why
should
they
have
an
open
hand?"
Several
PILs
have
been
filed
by
several
retired
senior
police
officers,
activists
and
private
citizens,
seeking
that
the
press,
particularly
TV
news
channels,
should
be
asked
to
exercise
restrain
in
their
reportage
on
the
Bollywood
actor's
death
case.
The
pleas
also
called
out
press
for
conducting
"media
trials"
and
scribing
roles
and
presuming
guilt
of
the
accused
persons,
thus
hampering
a
fair
probe
and
trial
.
ASG:
The
Press
Has
The
Freedom
And
Its
Rights
Additional
Solicitor
General
(ASG)
Anil
Singh,
who
appeared
for
the
Union
government,
told
the
bench
that
news
channels
"did
not
have
an
open
hand
as
such.
It
is
not
as
if
the
government
is
not
doing
anything.
It
does
take
action
on
complaints
received
(against
channels).
But
ultimately,
the
government
cannot
control
everything.
The
press
has
the
freedom
and
its
rights".
However,
the
court
revealed
that
all
the
complaints
received
earlier
have
been
forwarded
to
private
bodies
such
as
the
News
Broadcasters
Association
(NBA)
and
News
Broadcasters
Federation
(NBF).
Devadatt
Kamat
Asks
Government
To
Take
Charge
Senior
advocate
Devadatt
Kamat,
who
appeared
for
the
NBA,
has
claimed
that
it
is
the
government's
responsibility
to
look
into
the
matter
than
outsourcing
it.
He
also
said
that
statutory
provisions
and
rules
exist
under
the
Cable
TV
Act
and
the
Center
should
enforce
these
provisions.
"The
question
is
whether
this
outsourcing
is
permissible
or
whether
the
authorities
have
to
be
responsible
to
enforce
what
the
statute
provides.
When
government
has
a
regime
in
place,
where
is
the
question
of
GOI
(Government
of
India)
abdicating
its
duties
and
asking
these
private,
self-righteous
associations
(to
look
into
complaints)?"
Kamat
said.
Devadatt
Kamat
Questions
The
Leak
Of
Information
Amid
Investigation
He
also
argued
that
the
media
trial
in
Sushant's
case
against
the
accused
violated
her
right
to
life
and
personal
liberty
as
guaranteed
by
Article
21
of
the
Constitution
and
that
it
amounted
to
an
interference
in
the
administration
of
justice.
He
urged
the
court
to
look
at
the
"allied
issue"
of
the
"leakage
of
information
by
investigating
agencies"
while
their
probes
are
going
on.
According
to
reports,
Bombay
High
Court
will
continue
hearing
the
arguments
in
the
case
on
Wednesday,
October
14,
2020.