Showik Chakraborty's Bail: Court Says Funding Illicit Drug Trafficking Charge Doesn't Apply In His Case
Last week, a special NDPS court granted bail to actor Rhea Chakraborty's brother Showik. The court said that the stringent charge of financing illicit drug trafficking did not apply to his case.
Last
week,
a
special
NDPS
court
granted
bail
to
actor
Rhea
Chakraborty's
brother
Showik
and
in
the
recent
hearing,
the
court
said
that
the
stringent
charge
of
financing
illicit
drug
trafficking
did
not
apply
to
his
case.
According
to
reports,
the
charge
under
Section
27A
of
the
Narcotic
Drugs
and
Psychotropic
Substances
(NDPS)
Act
was
the
key
grounds
on
which
Showik's
bail
had
been
rejected
for
almost
three
months.
The
charge
reportedly
attracts
a
maximum
of
20
years
in
jail.
Showik
was
arrested
by
the
Narcotics
Control
Bureau
(NCB)
on
September
4
in
the
drugs
case
in
connection
with
actor
Sushant
Singh
Rajput's
death.
He
was
accused
of
procuring
ganja
for
Sushant,
who
was
in
a
relationship
with
Rhea
until
before
his
death
on
June
14.
A
report
in
E
Times
revealed
that
special
judge
G
B
Gurao
said,
"The
court
has
to
see
that
there
are
reasonable
grounds
for
believing
that
accused
is
not
guilty.
The
ingredient
of
Section
27A
of
NDPS
Act
are
absent
in
the
case
of
the
applicant."
The
special
NDPS
court
pointed
out
that
no
drugs
were
recovered
from
Showik,
as
stated
by
the
prosecution.
It
also
observed
that
the
arrest
was
done
on
the
basis
of
his
own
statement
and
the
statement
of
the
co-accused.
Court
ordered
that
investigations
had
revealed
that
Showik
was
not
concerned
with
the
seizure
of
"commercial
quantity" of
LSD
from
co-accused
Anuj
Keshwani.
"The
seizure
of
contraband
from
accused
Anuj
Keshwani
is
an
independent
recovery,"
the
court
said.
The
court
also
considered
Showik's
age
and
the
fact
that
he
was
a
student
and
had
no
criminal
antecedents
and
said,
"Applicant
is
permanent
resident
of
given
address
and
he
is
ready
to
abide
by
the
conditions,
if
any,
imposed
by
the
court.
Further,
co-accused
are
released
on
bail.
Hence,
in
view
of
the
facts
and
circumstance
of
the
case,
I
find
that
applicant
is
entitled
for
bail."