The
ongoing
alleged
drug
case
involving
superstar
Shah
Rukh
Khan's
son
Aryan
Khan
saw
the
star
kid's
bail
being
rejected
on
yesterday's
hearing
and
the
bail
plea
is
expected
to
be
continued
today
(October
27).
However,
the
case
saw
Avin
Sahu
and
Manish
Rajgarhiya
who
were
the
star
kid's
co-accused
get
bail.
The
two
became
the
first
people
to
get
bail
in
the
case
on
October
26.
Avin
Sahu
and
Manish
Rajgarhiya
got
bail
with
a
bail
bond
of
Rs
50,000.
According
to
a
news
report
in
ETimes,
the
order
for
the
same
was
passed
by
Special
Judge
VV
Patil.
Avin
was
represented
by
advocate
Sana
Raees
Khan
who
had
argued
that
the
case
involving
her
client
and
Aryan
Khan
was
different.
The
report
stated
that
the
only
evidence
against
Sahu
was
his
own
statement
which
he
had
later
retracted.
Manish
Rajgarhya
was
represented
by
advocate
Tareq
Sayed
who
argued
that
his
client
was
found
with
2.4
gms
of
Ganja.
The
lawyer
argued
that
ever
since
his
client's
arrest,
no
new
material
had
come
up
and
that
he
was
only
arrested
for
consumption.
The
advocate
further
presented
that
the
passing
of
the
substances
between
the
buyer
and
seller
should
be
established
through
investigation
and
that
there
should
be
a
common
objective
between
all
the
alleged
accused
towards
a
conspiracy.
Even
though
Advait
Sethna,
the
Special
Public
Prosecutor
initially
opposed
the
arguments,
both
Avin
Sahu
and
Manish
Rajgarhya
were
granted
bail.
Now,
all
eyes
are
on
Aryan
Khan's
hearing
that
will
be
continued
today.
The
decision
of
continuing
the
hearing
today
was
taken
after
Arbaaz
Merchant's
lawyer
and
the
ASG
said
that
they
will
need
45
minutes
each
for
their
arguments.
According
to
a
news
report
in
News18,
Mukul
Rohatgi,
former
Attorney
General
Of
India
who
appeared
on
Aryan
Khan's
behalf
told
the
court
during
the
hearing
that
his
client
was
not
a
customer
and
had
been
invited
on
the
cruise
as
a
special
guest.
Rohatgi
told
the
HC
bench,
"In
fact,
no
drugs
were
recovered
from
him
and
no
medical
test
was
done
to
prove
he
had
even
consumed."
He
further
argued
that
the
star
kid's
case
will
go
under
sections
8(c),
27
and
20(b)
and
not
Section
27A.