It
looks
like
trouble
has
not
yet
stopped
brewing
for
Alia
Bhatt's
Gangubai
Kathaiwadi.
The
Sanjay
Leela
Bhansali
directorial
has
once
again
landed
itself
in
legal
trouble.
Maharashtra
MLA
Amin
Patel
has
approached
the
Bombay
High
Court
against
the
use
of
the
area's
name
in
the
film's
title.
Patel
has
asked
for
the
area's
name
to
be
deleted
or
censored
from
the
title.
According
to
a
news
report
in
India
Today,
Shraddha
Surve,
a
local
of
Kamathipura,
where
a
number
of
brothels
previously
operated,
filed
a
petition
which
was
mentioned
before
a
division
bench
of
Justices
Madhav
Jamdar
and
Gautam
Patel
on
Tuesday
(February
22).
The
petition
sought
an
urgent
hearing
as
the
movie
is
slated
to
release
on
Friday
(February
25).
The
bench
revealed
that
it
would
hear
the
petition
on
Wednesday
(February
23).
A
PIL
(Public
Interest
Litigation)
filed
by
MLA
Amin
Patel
raised
the
same
matter.
The
same
was
presented
before
a
division
bench
of
Chief
Justice
Dipankar
Datta
and
Justice
MS
Karnik.
This
bench
will
also
reportedly
hear
the
petition
on
Wednesday.
The
petition
that
was
filed
by
Shraddha
Surve
says
that
Gangubai
Kathiawadi
shows
the
residents
of
Kamathipura
in
bad
light
and
might
cause
humiliation
to
the
residents.
The
report
quoted
the
petition
to
state,
"If
the
movie
is
allowed
to
be
released
with
the
name
Kamathipura,
then
it
would
cause
harm
and
disrespect
to
the
residents,
especially
women.
There
should
be
no
reference
to
the
name
Kamathipura.
Let
the
name
be
changed
to
anything
else
Mayapuri
or
Mayanagari."
Surve
furthermore
mentioned
that
not
even
five
per
cent
of
the
population
in
Kamathipura
is
active
in
prostitution.
Her
petition
mentioned
that
the
reputation
of
the
area
has
been
at
stake
ever
since
the
trailer
of
Gangubai
Kathiawadi
released.
She
alleged
that
the
film
is
portraying
Kamathipura
in
a
derogatory
manner
and
showing
the
area
as
a
'red
light
hub'.
The
petition
added
that
as
a
result,
all
the
female
residents
of
Kamathipura
will
be
labelled
as
prostitutes
and
will
be
shamed
and
eve
teased.
Furthermore,
it
added
that
their
families
will
have
to
live
in
shame.
On
the
other
hand,
Amin
Patel's
PIL
mentioned
that
he
received
objections
from
many
residents
and
local
social
service
organizations
revolting
against
the
portrayal
of
the
area
as
a
place
of
flesh
trade.