Amid Rs 370 Biryani Backlash, Munawar Faruqui Appeals To Fans to Stop Trolling Pranit More: Jab Kisi Ki Laash…

Munawar Faruqui has asked social media users to stop extending the outrage around comedian Pranit More’s viral Rs 370 biryani show controversy, saying the people involved have already faced serious consequences. His comments come after a clip from More’s stand-up show triggered widespread anger, legal attention and professional fallout for 23-year-old Himanshu Jangra.

The controversy began after a crowd-work segment from one of More’s shows circulated widely online. In the video, Jangra spoke about a date with a woman and referred to spending Rs 370 on a plate of chicken biryani. His remark suggesting that he deserved a “return” on that spending was criticised as misogynistic and demeaning.

The backlash quickly moved beyond the original clip. Viewers criticised Jangra for the comment and More for allowing the exchange to continue during the show. Jangra later apologised and deactivated his social media accounts. More also issued an apology for the hurt caused by the incident, even as the matter drew the attention of authorities.

Munawar Faruqui asks people to stop targeting those involved

Munawar addressed the issue through a video shared on his Instagram story. He said the comments made during the show were wrong, but argued that public anger had reached a point where it needed to stop. His appeal focused on the danger of prolonged online targeting after apology, legal action and social consequences have already followed.

He said, “Mujhe lagta hai ab hum sabko tham jana chahiye. Comedian ne bahut galat baat boli, crowd work mein bhi bahut galat baat hui. Uss ladki ne bhi jo bola, main usse disagree karta hoon. Unhone jo bola, mujhe sunna pasand nahi hai, lekin ek level hota hai.”

His statement translates to: “I think all of us need to stop now. The comedian said something very wrong, and what happened during the crowd-work segment was also deeply problematic. I also disagree with what that woman said. I did not like hearing any of it, but there has to be a limit.”

Munawar further said the fallout had already been severe. “FIR ho gayi, job chali gayi, career khatam ho gaya, samaj mein izzat chali gayi, sab ho gaya. Unke saath unki baaton ke liye bahut bura hua hai, lekin ab tham jao. Content ke naam par jo unhe nichoda ja raha hai, bas karo bhai,” he said.

In English, he said an FIR had been filed, jobs had been lost, careers had been damaged and reputations had been ruined. He added that while the remarks deserved criticism, the repeated use of the incident as social media content should end.

Why the Rs 370 biryani controversy escalated

The incident grew because it sat at the intersection of comedy, gender, dating culture and social media accountability. Many users objected to the idea that spending money on a date could create an expectation of physical or emotional return. The phrasing, especially in a public performance setting, became the central reason for the anger.

Crowd work has become a popular format in Indian stand-up comedy, especially in clips posted online. It depends on unscripted exchanges between comedians and audience members. That spontaneity can create memorable moments, but it also carries risk when personal details, gender stereotypes or offensive comments become part of the performance.

In this case, criticism was not limited to Jangra’s comment. More also faced questions about a comedian’s responsibility during audience interaction. Viewers argued that performers cannot always hide behind improvisation when a conversation on stage turns harmful or humiliating for someone who is not present to respond.

The controversy then moved into real-world consequences. Jangra, who was employed at Starvik Design, lost his job after the clip gained traction. The company’s founder, Vivek Vishwakarma, announced the decision on social media. The matter also reached official forums, with Maharashtra Cyber Police registering a case against More.

The National Commission for Women also summoned both More and Jangra over the remarks. The NCW’s involvement made the controversy larger than a social media debate, placing it within a wider conversation on misogyny, public speech and accountability in entertainment spaces.

Munawar warns against online harassment

Munawar’s comments did not defend the remarks made during the show. Instead, he argued that public criticism should not become relentless harassment. He warned that a culture of endless digital punishment can have dangerous consequences, especially when people continue to be targeted after formal action has begun.

He said, “Unn logon ne jo baat boli, uska zakhm unhe mil gaya. Jab kisi ki laash niklegi na, tab tumhe samajh aayega. Bas karo ab. Har cheez ki ek limit hoti hai. Legally unpar jo hona hoga, ho jayega, par tum ab chup ho jao.”

The comedian’s message was that the legal process should take its course, while the public should avoid pushing the matter further for engagement. His warning reflected a growing concern in the entertainment industry: online outrage can begin as accountability, but may turn into mob pressure when there is no clear endpoint.

The debate has also reopened questions about how comedy clips are consumed online. A moment from a live show, once uploaded or leaked, can reach people far outside the room. That wider audience may judge the exchange without the full atmosphere of the performance, but the impact of the words remains public and lasting.

For comedians, the incident is a reminder that crowd interaction is no longer confined to the venue. For audiences, it shows how quickly participation in a show can become permanent digital material. For viewers, Munawar’s appeal raises another question: how should society balance accountability with restraint after consequences have already begun?

The Rs 370 biryani controversy continues to be discussed because it touches sensitive issues around respect, consent and public humour. With apologies issued, employment action taken and official proceedings underway, Munawar’s intervention has shifted the focus to whether online outrage should now give way to due process.