bredcrumb

Ranveer Singh Apologises in Kantara Row, Offers to Visit Chamundi Temple

| Published: Wednesday, March 25, 2026, 11:00 [IST]

Ranveer Singh’s controversial remarks on Kantara have taken a serious legal turn, with the actor now offering an unconditional apology before the Karnataka High Court.

In a key development, Singh has agreed to visit the Chamundi temple in Mysuru, as the court continues to hear the high-profile case.

Karnataka High Court Hearing: Key Developments
1/7

Karnataka High Court Hearing: Key Developments

Bollywood actor Ranveer Singh has tendered an unconditional apology before the Karnataka High Court over his controversial remarks related to the Kantara deity. The matter was heard by Justice M Nagaprasanna, who observed that the actor’s comments were “not right” and emphasized the responsibility that comes with public influence.

The court has now posted the next hearing for April 10, keeping the case under close scrutiny.

Actor Agrees to Temple Visit & Affidavit
2/7

Actor Agrees to Temple Visit & Affidavit

In a significant move, Singh’s counsel, Senior Advocate Sajan Poovayya, informed the court that the actor is willing to file an affidavit of apology. Additionally, Ranveer has agreed to visit the Chamundi Hills temple in Mysuru to offer his respects.

This step comes amid growing demands for a more personal and sincere apology beyond social media statements.

What Sparked the Kantara Controversy
3/7

What Sparked the Kantara Controversy

The controversy dates back to Ranveer Singh’s speech at the 55th International Film Festival of India (IFFI) in Goa. While praising Rishab Shetty’s performance in Kantara, Singh referred to the Chamundi deity as a “female ghost” and mimicked a Daiva performance.

The remarks quickly went viral, triggering backlash, especially from the Kannadiga community, who called the portrayal disrespectful to a deeply sacred tradition.

FIR, Legal Charges & Actor’s Defense
4/7

FIR, Legal Charges & Actor’s Defense

Following the uproar, an FIR was registered at Bengaluru’s High Grounds Police Station under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including religious insult and public mischief.

Ranveer Singh challenged the FIR in court, arguing that his comments were taken out of context and lacked any malicious intent. He maintained that his remarks were meant purely as appreciation for Shetty’s performance and not intended to hurt religious sentiments.

Reactions: Court, Complainant & Industry Voices
5/7

Reactions: Court, Complainant & Industry Voices

During the hearing, the court made strong oral observations, stating that public figures must exercise restraint. “You are not above the law,” the bench noted, underlining the influence celebrities wield.

Meanwhile, the complainant’s counsel questioned the sincerity of Singh’s earlier apology, calling it inadequate since it was posted via social media and not delivered personally.

Interestingly, Kantara star Rishab Shetty had earlier expressed discomfort with public performances of the Daiva ritual, calling it “sacred and emotionally connected” to the community.

Why This Case Is Trending
6/7

Why This Case Is Trending

The issue has gained traction for multiple reasons–Ranveer Singh’s star power, the cultural sensitivity surrounding Kantara, and the legal implications involving religious sentiments.

The timing also adds to the buzz, as the actor is currently riding high on the success of Dhurandhar 2, making this controversy a major talking point across entertainment and legal circles.

What Happens Next
7/7

What Happens Next

The Karnataka High Court will take up the matter again on April 10, when Ranveer Singh is expected to submit his affidavit of apology. His proposed visit to the Chamundi temple could also play a key role in shaping the court’s view.

Legal experts suggest that the actor’s willingness to take corrective steps may influence the proceedings, but the final outcome will depend on how the court evaluates intent, impact, and public accountability.

For now, the case remains a crucial reminder of the fine line between artistic expression and cultural sensitivity in today’s digital age.

Disclaimer

The images featured on this page are sourced from publicly available platforms, official press releases, and promotional materials. These images are published strictly for editorial, informational, and news reporting purposes under the principles of fair use.
We do not claim ownership of any images unless explicitly stated. All image copyrights belong to their respective photographers, production houses, or copyright holders.
If you are the rightful owner of any image and believe that its use on this website is unauthorized or objectionable, please contact us ([email protected]) with proper details. We will promptly review and remove the content if required.

X