Much
has
been
spoken
and
is
still
being
discussed
about
a
series
of
controversies
surrounding
the
talented
actor,
Silambarasan
a.k.a
Simbu.
It
was
Gautham
Menon,
the
director
of
Vinnaithandi
Varuvaya
and
Accham
Enbathu
Madamaiyada,
who
first
reported
about
Simbu's
indiscipline,
lethargy
and
non-punctual
behaviour
on
the
sets
followed
by
Pandiraj
of
Idhu
Namma
Aalu's
fame.
The
recent
one
to
break
the
social
media
and
even
the
Nadigar
Sangam
was
a
detailed
written
and
visual
complaint
of
the
director
and
producer
of
Anbanavan
Asaradhavan
Adangadhavan
(AAA),
where
the
duo
have
shared
their
horrifying
experiences
with
the
actor.
As
a
response
to
Micheal
Rayappan's
(Producer
of
AAA)
complaint,
Simbu's
camp
lashed
back
at
the
producer
a
few
days
ago.
Hariharan
Naidu,
a
close
aide
of
Simbu
has
fired
back
at
Rayappan.
He
said
"Just
think
this
in
another
angle,
why
would
a
producer,
who
used
the
troublesome
actor,
use
him
to
promote
another
venture,
Kee,
and
once
again
lodge
a
complaint
on
him?
What
was
favorable
during
the
promotions
time
and
what
has
changed
now?
Is
it
due
to
someone's
compulsion?"
He
said,
the
producer
provided
just
the
one
side
of
the
story
as
he
said
that
Simbu
didn't
turn
out
for
the
Bangkok
shoot
schedule
but
he
did
not
reveal
the
other
side
of
the
same
that
the
actor
didn't
join
sets
because
the
producer
failed
to
settle
his
salary.
Naidu
also
added
that
Rayappan
claims
to
have
paid
the
full
amount
of
salary
to
Simbu
which
if
real,
can
be
proved
by
releasing
the
payment
details
made
to
the
actor.
Naidu
iterated
that
the
producer
claimed
to
have
incurred
a
loss
of
Rs
20
Cr
because
of
Simbu's
reckless
attitude.
But
he
questions
the
producer
as
to
what
happened
to
the
money
he
gained
by
selling
the
movie?
Did
the
producer
sell
the
movie
for
free?
Naidu
questions
the
producer.
Now,
the
34-year-old
actor
himself
has
jumped
into
the
foray
and
has
responded
to
a
segment
of
the
allegation.
The
Vaalu
actor
said,
"I
cannot
be
answerable
to
a
film
which
is
done
and
is
already
released.
Let
the
Nadigar
Sangam
intervene
and
help
me
in
getting
my
remaining
remuneration
owed
by
Michael
Rayappan
which
amounts
to
about
Rs
3.5
Cr.
This
is
a
long
pending
issue
as
I
had
even
lodged
a
complaint
much
before
AAA's
release."
Michael
Rayappan
alleged
that
Simbu's
lack
of
professionalism
led
him
suffer
a
huge
setback
which
brings
a
nightmare
to
the
producer
who
boasts
of
a
career
spanning
12
years
in
the
industry.
"After
he
was
formally
signed
for
the
project,
he
hardly
turned
up
for
any
discussion.
Shooting
was
impossible
for
he
hardly
turned
up."
"On
many
occasions,
we
had
to
pack
up
for
the
day
without
even
canning
a
single
shot',
he
said
and
added,
'I
had
been
to
his
house
and
waited
for
over
four
hours
to
meet
him
and
convince
him
to
attend
the
shoot," exclaimed
a
disappointed
Rayappan.
Simbu
counter-attacked
Rayappan's
allegations,
"If
I
had
taken
an
advance
for
a
film
and
if
a
problem
arises
while
it's
on
floors,
I
am
answerable
for
that.
Why
would
I
respond
to
anyone's
claim
when
the
movie
has
been
already
released?
If
the
issue
was
taken
upright
during
the
shooting
of
AAA,
the
action
would
have
been
justified
and
carried
more
sense."
"That
being
the
case,
it's
not
fair
on
part
of
the
Producers
Council
to
question
me
about
the
issue
now.
I
haven't
received
any
official
letter
from
panel.
It
is
also
to
be
noted
that
I
had
to
forgo
a
part
of
salary
to
facilitate
the
release
of
the
movie,"
Simbu
said.