Kay Kay Menon speaks on Corporate
Courtesy:
IndiaFM
Friday,
July
07,
2006
He
believes
in
characters
and
not
in
roles.
From
Bhopal
Express,
Haazaron
Khwahishey
Aisi
to
Sarkar,
the
talented
actor
Kay
Kay
Menon
has
played
an
array
of
characters
in
Bollywood.
A
method
actor,
Kay
Kay
Menon
plays
a
rich
business
tycoon
in
Madhur
Bhandarkar's
next
film
Corporate
and
has
no
qualms
about
playing
the
male
lead
of
a
woman-oriented
film.
He
defends
his
role
saying,
"Most
of
the
Hindi
movies
have
male
protagonists
so
there
is
no
harm
in
doing
one
woman
oriented
film
like
Corporate.
I
don't
think
men
should
complain
about
it."
What
is
Corporate
all
about?
It
deals
with
the
trials
and
tribulations
of
Corporate
life.
It
deals
with
war
and
ambitions
within
companies
and
also
the
human
emotions
attached
to
it.
-->What
is
your
role
in
the
movie?
I
play
a
character
who
comes
from
a
business
family
and
owns
a
couple
of
companies.
Because
of
my
heritage,
I
am
already
at
the
top
executive
level
of
the
company.
I
can't
say
anything
more
about
the
role.
It
deals
with
the
conflict
between
human
emotions
and
ambitions.
My
character
is
neither
positive
nor
negative.
In
fact,
the
time
has
gone
when
films
used
to
have
positive
or
negative
characters.
Characters
today
have
all
kinds
of
shades
in
them.
There
are
no
more
black
or
white
characters.
This
character
is
a
likable
one.
What
interests
you
to
take
on
a
character?
Primarily,
the
script
has
to
be
interesting.
This
film
deals
with
the
entire
Corporate
life.
The
role
had
a
lot
of
dimensions
in
terms
of
performance.
It
had
good
storyline,
director
and
of
course
even
the
money
was
good!
(laughs)
Do
you
relate
to
this
character
in
real
life?
This
character
is
believable.
There
is
nothing
fictional
about
him.
My
whole
attempt
in
terms
of
performance
is
that
whatever
character
I
play,
be
it
in
the
genre
of
fantasy,
fiction
or
science
fiction;
it
has
to
be
made
believable!
So
we
tried
to
make
it
as
believable
as
possible.
This
role
and
the
film
are
very
believable.
Have
you
done
any
preparations
to
portray
it?
There
was
no
attempt
from
my
side
to
look
different.
I
believe
that
every
role
is
different
from
the
other.
A
person
has
to
be
inherently
different
from
the
other
person.
So
it's
not
an
attempt
to
be
different
but
to
be
truthful
to
that
character.
Whether
it's
Haazaron
Khwahishey
Aisi,
Sarkar
or
any
other
movie
that
I
have
done,
there
wasn't
any
attempt
to
be
different.
Only
the
roles
were
different.
They
can't
be
the
same.
So
you
just
need
to
identify
it
and
stick
to
it.
I
don't
believe
in
any
kind
of
academic
research
on
any
character
unless
it's
a
historical
character.
Otherwise
fictional
characters
should
be
born
and
should
die
there.
You
should
not
try
for
unnecessary
research.
I
work
the
other
way
around.
I
believe
in
working
on
the
text.
The
script
and
director
should
be
the
source
of
your
performance.
You
should
use
your
own
imagination
on
how
to
mould
the
character.
Tell
us
something
about
the
entire
look
of
your
character.
The
look
emerges
out
of
a
character.
You
cannot
take
an
external
look
to
portray
a
character.
As
you
go
through
the
character,
in
terms
of
script
and
scenes,
various
elements
of
the
character
will
emerge.
You
need
to
keep
on
working.
Automatically,
a
form
emerges
and
you
get
to
identify
with
the
look.
Normally
I
never
differentiate
between
roles
and
characters.
As
I
said,
the
look
should
be
derived
directly
from
the
character
not
from
the
role.
Siddharth
in
Haazaron
Khwahishey
Aisi,
is
a
character
but
the
revolutionary
person
is
the
role.
So
you
have
to
differentiate
between
them
and
the
look
comes
automatically.
How
was
it
working
with
Madhur
Bhandarkar?
This
is
my
first
film
with
him.
He
is
very
earthy
person
in
terms
direction.
His
emotions
come
from
the
kind
of
background
that
he
comes
from.
He
taps
emotions
which
are
very
earthy
in
nature.
It
was
very
interesting
for
me
to
explore
those
areas
while
performing.
Madhur's
inputs
helped
me
a
lot
to
portray
my
character.
How
was
it
working
with
Bipasha
Basu?
Well,
Bipasha
comes
from
a
different
stream
of
cinema.
I
was
completely
surprised
and
impressed
by
the
way
she
carried
out
those
emotions
on
her
face,
through
her
eyes.
She
could
hold
a
frame
without
speaking
a
line,
which
shows
the
expertise
of
an
actress.
People
might
say
she
relates
to
glamour
part
of
cinema
but
when
it
comes
to
performing
especially
in
Corporate
she
can
hold
a
frame
without
speaking
a
line.
That
is
what
good
actors
can
do.
You
have
always
tried
variations
in
your
characters.
Which
role
is
closest
to
your
heart?
The
character
that
challenged
me
completely
is
the
character
of
the
movie,
Paanch.
Then,
my
roles
in
Haazaron
Khwahishey
Aisi
and
Sarkar
challenged
me
as
an
actor.
It
required
a
whole
new
dimension
for
me
to
explore,
in
terms
of
my
whole
spectrum
and
my
personality.
Madhur
has
always
dealt
with
woman
oriented
subjects.
Do
you
think
your
character
has
received
an
equal
screenplay
justice?
It
has.
It
deals
with
the
relationship
of
a
man
with
a
woman
in
the
Corporate
world.
If
the
relationship
has
to
be
complete,
then
you
need
both.
And
it
is
not
only
a
woman
centric
film.
Though
Madhur
usually
has
female
protagonist
in
his
movies,
it's
perfectly
fine
by
me.
Most
of
the
Hindi
movies
have
male
protagonists
so
there
is
no
harm
in
doing
one
woman
oriented
film
like
Corporate.
I
don't
think
men
should
complain
about
it.
It
was
great
fun
to
work
in
that
set
up
where
you
know
that
there
is
going
to
be
a
complete
equation.
What
does
Corporate
mean
to
you?
As
a
film,
it
means
a
lot
because
we
worked
hard
in
terms
of
performance.
It
could
be
one
of
the
best
that
I
could
see!
What
kind
of
fate
it
goes
through
is
something
I
don't
have
control
over.
And the Corporate world does not really mean much to me. I have gone through it and know exactly what it is. But yes, the film Corporate means a lot to me.
What
is
USP
of
Corporate?
I
think
the
cast
is
quite
interesting
and
I
have
not
done
bad
work
earlier.
So
people
would
look
forward
to
something
good
from
me!
Of
course,
Bipasha
is
in
a
new
kind
of
role.
So
this
would
be
the
USP
of
the
film.
It
deals
with
the
different
walks
of
Corporate
life.
You
started
from
theatre.
How
is
it
different
from
films?
Theatre
and
films
are
totally
two
different
mediums.
A
good
theatre
actor
need
not
be
a
good
film
actor
and
a
film
actor
need
not
be
a
good
in
theatre.
Or
at
the
same
time,
he
could
be
good
in
both.
But
there
is
no
hard
and
fast
rule
that
if
you
are
from
theatre
then
you
must
be
good
actor.
The
only
advantage
of
theatre
is
that
you
become
used
to
acting.
The
primary
difference
in
theatre
is
that
the
actor
has
to
reach
out
to
the
audience
while
in
cinema
the
audience
reaches
out
to
the
actor.
So
if
the
actor
is
intelligent
enough
to
understand
both
the
mediums
and
adapt
well,
then
he
will
be
a
good
actor
in
both
the
mediums.
What
are
the
forthcoming
projects
you
are
working
on?
I
am
done
with
Corporate.
I
have
almost
finished
a
film
called
Honeymoon
Travels
Pvt
Ltd.
directed
by
Reema
Katgi.
It
has
an
interesting
cast
and
is
about
seven
couples.
It's
a
fun
movie
in
which
I
am
playing
a
Bengali
husband.
Raima
plays
my
wife.
I
play
a
nerdy
husband
but
at
a
comic
level.
There is one more film called Shunya with Arindum Mitra which is based on a cricketer's life. It's quite interesting. It has Naseer, Irfaan and Tulip Joshi.
Recent
Stories
A
chit
chat
with
madhur
bhandarkar
Aslam
Khan
in
Nayee
Padosan